All humans will eventually die I am a human Therefore, I’ll eventually die So, the conclusion that I’ll eventually die must be true.
Humans are the only species that feel pain. If you wish to ask any questions, seek clarification, raise some objections, or check how you went on the test questions, please write them in the comments section and I will try to respond as soon as I can.
I highly recommend purchasing the book ‘Understanding arguments’ by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Robert Rogelio, which is available for purchase in the link below. If you do purchase the book via this link, you are helping support this webpage.
Posted on April 7, 2019February 20, 2020 Author Andrew Tull och Tags arguments, critical thinking, Philosophy, sound arguments, soundness, unsound arguments An argument is unsound if and only if it either has a false premise or it is invalid. Added 8/8/2016 2:42:08 AM.
This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful. An argument is unsound if and only if it either has a false premise or it is invalid.
For an argument to be valid, it must take a form where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false. If the premises don't logically guarantee the conclusion, then the argument is invalid.
However, while an argument can be invalid or valid but unsound, it doesn't mean that the conclusion is false. The conclusion might be perfectly true, but the person doing the arguing got there through incorrect means.
Outline both arguments presenting the premises and the conclusions of both. Include a URL to the arguments drawn from a media source.
If you are unable to locate examples from the media, you may identify arguments from your life. Include a URL to the argument drawn from a media source.
If you are unable to locate examples from the media, you may identify an argument from your life. Examined Life: Martha Nussbaum .
Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbcGbflpFzI This video presents an argument that attempts to counter historical social contract theory. Students will analyze the video’s premises, conclusions, and presuppositions.
Alex Jones from Waking Life Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJXspT2VtOE Democratic Underground. Alex Jones’ rant from Waking Life .
This video analyzes women’s rights in Afghanistan and presents topics that relate to logical argumentation and lack of factual evidence in constructing social norms. Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: “Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service.
Christ either deceived mankind by conscious fraud, or He was Himself deluded and self-deceived, or He was Divine. In 1936, Watchman Née made a similar argument in his book, Normal Christian Faith.
You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon, or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about his being a great human teacher. Now it seems to me obvious that He was neither a lunatic nor a fiend: and consequently, however strange or terrifying or unlikely it may seem, I have to accept the view that He was and is God.
As William Lane Craig points out in Reasonable Faith, the first premise leaves out other possible options and is therefore false. The Jesus of the Bible may not be a liar or a lunatic or a Lord but rather a legend.
” Lewis works through some of Jesus’s startling claims about himself in Scripture, repeating his insistence that you can’t conclude that he was simply a “great moral teacher.” If what he said is true, Lewis says, then they are the sayings of a “megalomania.” In my opinion, the only person who can say that sort of thing is either God or a complete lunatic suffering from that form of delusion, which undermines the whole mind of man.
On the contrary we get the impression that none of His immediate followers or even of the New Testament writers embraced the doctrine at all easily. Now, as a literary historian, I am perfectly convinced that whatever else the Gospels are they are not legends.
I have read a great deal of legend, and I am quite clear that they are not the same sort of thing. From an imaginative point of view they are clumsy, they don’t work up to things properly.
Apart from bits of the Platonic dialogues, there is no conversation that I know of in ancient literature like the Fourth Gospel. There is nothing, even in modern literature, until about a hundred years ago when the realistic novel came into existence.
It becomes unsound if the premises of the statement are not true and are not supported by facts. The statement that presents an unsound argument is: Women should not be firefighters because they have not been involved in firefighting until recently.
(In other words, the truth of the conclusion is guaranteed if all the premises are true) Orbit is impossible to have a false conclusion if all the premises are true. If John buys a house, he will run for a position on the neighborhood council.
Therefore, if John gets a raise, he will run for a position on the neighborhood council.” If an argument is invalid, then it is possible for the conclusion to be false even if all the premises are true.
A strong inductive argument is one in which the conclusion follows probably from the premises: “Every Banana plant that I have grown outside always dies immediately at the first touch of frost.
Last but not least, In any good and strong argument, we need to always AVOID having Vagueness in our premises and conclusion whereby the message sent to the other party should be Clear and Complete.